I've read plenty of silly
articles in my time, but the naive nonsense from the President of the Australian
Population Institute (wonder who funds it?) just about takes the cake.
Ms Jane Nathan says in today's
Age 16 July 2015 that Melbourne is headed for eight million by 2050, and goes
on to describe what it will be like in the most wildly optimistic tones
imaginable. She says "our social harmony, kaleidoscopic culture, clean
food, innovative education systems and greatly reduced crime rates are the envy
of the world. Our neighbourhoods are artistic, green and pristine".
Sounds like paradise. The
problem is, there is no evidence to support it. Indeed all the evidence points
in the opposite direction. Rapid population growth in Melbourne has produced
higher crime rates, with domestic violence and the ice epidemic blighting our
city. Education for our young people has more costly and less valuable, with
increasing graduate unemployment and alarming reports of dodgy private training
colleges and cheating at universities. The risk of terrorist attack is higher.
And as for green and pristine, just this week it was reported that even common
Australian birds, like the Willy Wagtail and the Kookaburra, were being sighted
much less frequently. The reason for this is that the streets of mature gardens
that used to give our birds food and shelter have been replaced by multi-unit
developments and high rise. The vegetation has been destroyed, and the birds
have died out.
And the evidence from cities
overseas which have got to eight million and more is pretty clear too. Terrible
traffic congestion, lousy housing affordability, poor quality open space, big
gaps between rich and poor, and an underclass of poverty, drugs and crime. Ms
Nathan can endeavour to talk up eight million and sell it as an exciting future
all she likes, but there is absolutely no evidence to warrant this "she'll
be right" approach to rapid population growth.
Kelvin
Thomson MP
Thanks again Kelvin for helping people join the dots on their quality of life decline and the population growth policies which remain in place and largely unquestioned.
ReplyDelete