I know first-hand in my
electorate of Wills a number of constituents who have been affected adversely
as result of poor advice or management by their financial advisor.
People have lost their homes, hundreds of thousands of dollars, their
Self-Managed Super Funds, their share portfolios and their health etc because
of poor advice and management.
Clients in share
portfolios and managed investments schemes including Timbercorp and other
agribusinesses, were not aware of the Agribusiness loans and in particular the
loan conditions were either misrepresented or not disclosed. These loans effectively
resulted in some clients being geared twice over.
Where gearing was
disclosed clients were assured that the margin loans would never exceed 50%. In
fact, the margin loans exceeded 200%, resulting in clients losing their entire
share portfolio and other assets. Investors were explicitly assured their homes
were safe.
In some instances clients were asked just to sign
the rear page, which were not witnessed in their presence. Asset, liability and
income details were often left blank or were completed after the client had
signed the application (as they were told their office needed to finalise
details on their behalf). Some of the loan documents recently obtained from
Timbercorp Finance show that these details were never completed, or had
liability details erased, or included incorrect client information.
Timbercorp management/maintenance/insurance fees
and other agribusiness fees were disguised by being rolled into refinancing of
debt.
Timbercorp increased the level of commission paid
to Financial Advisors to promote their geared investments as the GFC began to
impact.
A number of clients were pressured to increase
their level of investment in Timbercorp even when the product was failing.
Undisclosed incentives were provided in relation to
the recommending of Timbercorp products (for instance, the provision of
overseas trips and possibly the granting of equity in Timbercorp companies).
Given that Timbercorp were required to disclose all incentives they might pay
to advisers distributing their products, this was an apparent breach of the
requirements of the Corporations Act.
The significant
omissions and potential fraud in respect to loan documentation should be
investigated and all debts frozen and recovery action ceased by the respective
creditors. ANZ, CBA, Macquarie Bank and other credit providers should explain
their involvement and why such significant breaches of lending practices were
permitted and should waive debts that would not have arisen but for their
negligence.
The ANZ recently announced
a record full year profit of $7.3 billion, up 15 per cent on a year ago, while
the Commonwealth Bank posted a full-year cash
profit of $8.7 billion, a record for an Australian lender. There is clearly
the capacity for some debt forgiveness here. I remind the ANZ of ‘forgiveness’
taxpayers extended major financial institutions during the GFC when government
action guaranteed the banks survival.
The relevant
regulators, APRA and ASIC should independently investigate the arrangements and
when fraud and other lending anomalies are established, they should explore
grounds to award compensation to clients affected.
It is important for
Australian investors to come forward with their experiences and evidence to
inform the Parliament on further regulatory changes that may be necessary in
this sector.
For its part, Labor
will take to the next election a firm commitment to proceed with the broad
thrust of its Future of Financial Advice reforms – important changes that the
current government has dismantled.
No comments:
Post a Comment