As the first
international, legally binding agreement establishing common standards for the
transfer of conventional arms, the Treaty provides a basis to curb the damaging
illicit arms trade. Article Six of the Treaty sets out circumstances where the
export of arms is banned, including where the UN Security Council has put in
place an arms embargo and where arms would be used in the commission of
genocide or crimes against humanity. Article Seven requires arms exporting
countries to conduct an assessment, before they export arms, as to whether the
arms would contribute to or undermine peace and security, could be used to commit
or facilitate serious violations of international law, or acts constituting
terrorism or organised crime, or could be used to commit or facilitate acts of
violence against women and children.
The Treaty is far from
comprehensive or perfect. It lacks enforcement mechanisms. It leaves some
definitions to the nation states themselves, which is likely to prove
problematic in countries like the United States of America, where gun culture
is rife and the Congress is timid about controlling firearms. Grenades are not
covered. Non-monetary transfers of arms may fall outside the scope of the
Treaty. It will be need to be tightened up when it is reviewed in a year's
time.
But there is no doubt
about the importance of this work. Studies suggest that for many developing or
fragile states, a combination of weak domestic regulation of authorised
firearms possession with theft, loss or corrupt sale from official holdings is
a bigger problem than illicit trafficking across borders.
In 2009 the Costa Rica President Oscar Arias, introducing the Treaty at the United Nations, said “it is up to us to ensure that in twenty years we do not awaken to the same terrors we suffer today... The leaders of humanity have the responsibility to put principles before profits, and enable the promise of a future in which, finally, we can sleep peacefully".
No comments:
Post a Comment