Monday, September 9, 2013

Statement on Labor Frontbench, Labor's Future, Leadership, Policy & Wills Electorate

Thank you to the Wills Electorate

First I want to say a heartfelt thank you to the people of Wills, and to my campaign team, who have given me wonderful support throughout this election campaign, and indeed the months and years leading up to it. The Electoral Commission figures reported in this morning’s newspapers show that I have the strongest two-party preferred vote of any Labor candidate in Australia. These outcomes can change of course depending on final vote counting and preference distribution, but it is a great honour to have such a strong level of support, and I am determined to work hard in the next Parliament to be a vigorous and forceful advocate and representative of the people of Wills.

Labor Frontbench

As I told my campaign team on Saturday night, I will not be a candidate for the Opposition frontbench. I was a Shadow Minister for 10 years prior to 2007. I have been there and done that. It is my experience that being a Shadow Minister brings with it obligations not to speak outside your portfolio, and to have everything you do say cleared and approved by the Leader of the Opposition’s office. For me these limitations are simply too great in a world and an Australia which I believe is facing massive challenges.

The world is being damaged, perhaps irreparably by rapid population growth, climate change, unchecked rainforest and other habitat destruction, poverty, war and terrorism. Australia is not immune from these challenges. Many of our unique and beautiful birds, plants and animals, are on the brink of extinction. Our young people can’t afford to buy a home of their own, and their jobs are insecure, while pensioners and retirees battle rapidly rising electricity, gas and water bills and council rates.

I need to be able to speak out about these things, and I intend to. Anyone who thinks my decision to return to the backbench means that I am looking to lead a quiet life and slip out the back door is very mistaken. On the contrary, it is a necessary pre-condition for being active in the debate about the issues which are of greatest importance to the world and this country. 

Labor’s Future

Labor’s election loss was not a function of poor economic management. We delivered low inflation, low unemployment, low interest rates, a triple A credit rating, and low public sector debt. We are the envy of other countries right around the world. It was a function of poor political management.

There are two key aspects of this- leadership and policy.


Over the years we have seen a steady, relentless drift of power away from the electorate, away from political party members, away from Members of Parliament, away from Ministers and Shadow Ministers, towards Party Leaders.

This is fundamentally undemocratic. Ordinary voters have plenty of opportunities to catch up with me and other Members of Parliament and make their views known to us. They have no hope of accessing Prime Ministers and Premiers.

And the trend to leave everything to a Messiah leads to poor decisions which have been made by a small group of people, and not submitted to proper scrutiny. On the floor of the Victorian Parliament is written “Where no counsel is the people fail, but in the multitude of counsellors there is wisdom”.

In the last Parliament there were numerous botched policy announcements which had not been subjected to scrutiny by the Parliamentary Labor Party, certainly not scrutiny by Labor Party Branch members and the electorate, and in some cases not even by Ministers.

My advice to the next Leader of the Parliamentary Labor Party is twofold:-

1)    Do less. Avoid the trap of the 24/7 media cycle, and don’t try to do everything. Don’t suffocate your Ministerial and Parliamentary colleagues by constantly dominating the airwaves. Giving them more say means giving voters more say. It also gives you more time to see that decisions are properly implemented, and helps save you from the trap of trying to do too much. We don’t need to announce something everyday; what we need to do is to get right the things we do announce.

2)    Give the Parliamentary Party, and the voters, some real power, by taking proposals there first, AND leaving them for consideration at the next meeting. Many decisions are announced without consulting the Caucus at all, while others are presented as a fait accompli to a Caucus Meeting. MPs have no opportunity to consult with their constituents or interested parties about the proposal. It would be far more democratic, and lead to far fewer stuff-ups, if proposals were taken to the Parliamentary Party and left there for proper consideration.

Party Branches and Policy Committees are largely moribund, and Party Conferences and the Caucus have been acting as a rubber stamp. The leadership needs to stop taking and announcing decisions without consulting them, and thereby resuscitate and breathe life into them.


We need our policies to be in touch with the views of voters. I am all in favour of us being a middle of the road party, but some in our party interpret middle of the road as doing what big business wants. I believe being middle of the road is doing what voters want.

If we did what voters want, on issues like population growth, migration, planning, foreign ownership, live animal export, rather than what big business wants, we would do a lot better.


  1. Wise words Kelvin and congrats on your return to the HOR. I hope you are able to convince your colleagues of the wisdom of your thoughts and there are changes. Abbott is a loose cannon, time may be not long before there is trouble within Coalition ranks. I for one cannot see Abbott surviving a full term

  2. If the ALP consisted of people like you and Albanese, you'd get my vote back. But what is most concerning about the ALP is the control of the factions. Labor lost this election when Gillard deposed Rudd. Blame Rudd for his on-the-fly approach all you like, but people didn't vote for the ALP because of the party's corrupt internecine influence peddling.

  3. Could not agree more Kelvin.

    Despite the accuracy of your analysis and the need to counter centralised control of the party, Greg Turnbull could still suggest, on Fran Kelly's Breakfast program today, that with the new leadership ballot arrangements, the members were the "new faceless men" and the ballot proposal to include them (us) was undemocratic.

    There is clearly a lot of work ahead to ensure an internally democratic Party, representative of its members and not just its leaders.

    Listen here from about 12.30 mins on.

  4. Thank you Kelvin for being a true politician, for saying things as they are, for representing the concerns of the electorate, for your strong stance on our "growth"-based and flawed economic model, and doing what we expect politicians to do - without the spin! The Labor party has lost ground because they have abandoned their traditional values, of representing working people.
    Thank you Kelvin!

    1. What I can't understand is why Kelvin is about the only politician who "gets it". A pity Kelvin won't stand for the leadership, but he's a consummate politician who knows what traps are around. Presumably he could lose credibility for his views if he was seen to promote them too strongly by standing for the leadership? Also it would give some the idea of voting down his views, presumably with some vigour given how far they seem to be from understanding. I certainly think that with such strong support in his electorate (and outside it) he cannot be ignored. I just hope he can get around the country and visit WA some time!

  5. Thank you Kelvin from a retiree, a grandmother, an Australian who wants to live in the 'best country in the world', a country of united people, a country that respects human and animal rights, environmental issues and social justice - so let's get going and get the best country in the world for my grandchildren and their children.

  6. I agree with Warwick (above) who asks the question – how come Kelvin is the only one who "gets it"?
    Kelvin's statement is very reassuring in that someone really sees the issues clearly, and is placing himself in the best position to progress the solution to those issues.
    When I watched Kevin 07 relentlessly positioning himself, in hard hat and fluorescent jacket, for that 24-hour media cycle I asked myself the question - when does he ever get to the desk? - when can anyone walk into his office and say - "look, Kev, this is what I think".
    (I am double checking the Kevins and Kelvin's at this stage!!!)

    We need Kelvin's moral leadership more than anything. The world is facing great challenges – the main one is overpopulation - these are the challenges which must be faced with energy.